I would say two next steps in parallel. The first one is clearly to better select the patients. I think we are doing—sorry for all the community—but we are doing a stupid job. Imagine that we are treating a patient with diabetes. Of course, you would try to understand whether the patient is responsive to insulin or not. If you give insulin to all the diabetic patients, it’s just stupid and we are doing exactly the same in Parkinson’s disease...
I would say two next steps in parallel. The first one is clearly to better select the patients. I think we are doing—sorry for all the community—but we are doing a stupid job. Imagine that we are treating a patient with diabetes. Of course, you would try to understand whether the patient is responsive to insulin or not. If you give insulin to all the diabetic patients, it’s just stupid and we are doing exactly the same in Parkinson’s disease. So, one way to really improve the clinical trial is to work with selected population of patients. And for that, we need better biomarkers to characterize those patients. So, this is one way to improve the clinical trial.
The other way is that most of the drugs we are using are not going to the right place in the brain. And the pharma industry needs to have better ways to bring the molecule first into the brain. If we are taking as an example, the anti-inflammatory drugs, PD patients are very often elderly people and anti-inflammatory drug is one of the best drug to kill the elderly people due to medication. If you have stomach bleeding, it’s just a catastrophe. And the reason for the failure is that we have the side effects, which very often are peripheral effects, and the drug might have a fantastic effect in the brain if you get rid of the side effects which are very often peripheral effects. So, it’s a challenge for the drug industry and the biotechs.